home :: summary writing lesson
The job of writing a summary is often confusing to students. Does the teacher want a sentence or two, or a couple of pages? How much information should actually be provided in a good summary? Sometimes the teacher will tell students how long to make a summary, but even then, how are students to know what to put in and what to leave out?
What skills will I learn in this module?
What makes a good summary?
Essentially, a summary is a condensed version of something, usually a text. A good summary is concise, focusing on the main ideas, and leaving out much of the supporting and explanatory detail of the original text. A good summary is also complete, covering all of the important ideas found in the primary text. Moreover, a summary should be objective; the goal should be to cover the text fairly, without inserting one's own opinion or perspective. For this reason, a summary is not really an essay. An essay requires the writer to create an original text, as in an argument wherein one asserts a point of view, or a research paper in which one synthesizes and analyzes the work of many others.
Writing a Concise Summary:
A concise summary is one in which the author's main ideas have been captured in a few well-chosen words, and supporting details have been characterized in a general way or reduced to a few representative details. A good strategy for capturing the key ideas is to go through the entire text and write the main point of each paragraph in the margin or on note paper. Then, go over your notes and ask yourself how each paragraph fits into the author's overall project: Why is it there? How does the paragraph advance the author's argument or goal? This step of shifting from what is there, to why it is there is absolutely essential in a good summary, for it will help you to characterize the work as a whole, showing how the parts fit together.
Writing a Complete Summary:
Though the goal in summary writing is to be concise and eliminate unecessary supporting details, it is also important not to misrepresent a work by leaving out important sections of an author's text. If an author spends a substantial amount of time and space on a topic, a summary should include at least a brief explanation of why that section is there. A complete summary is one that does not skip over key points.
Writing an Objective Summary:
It is important in summary writing to resist the temptation to insert evaluative comments, personal examples, and opinions. Even seemingly innocent adjectives used to describe an author's work, such as "thoughtful work" or "poignant insight" are inappropriate in a summary. A summary should be an objective and open-minded paraphrase of an author's work.
Introducing a Summary
A good summary generally begins with a brief introduction to let the reader know that what follows will be a summary of another text and not the writer's own response to a text or the writer's own ideas. The introduction may be a sentence or two or a paragraph depending on the length of the summary. It is important to characterize the work as a whole—what you think the writer was trying to accomplish in the work, or what the author's overall purpose seems to be.
In addition, the writer and title of the work being summarized should be named in the introduction, even if the author and/or text has been identified in a title.
The following is a good example of an introduction for a short summary (2 pages):
This introduction signals the reader that what follows will be a summary of Lewis' work, and that the key idea Lewis' is trying to get across is that the built landscape is a historical document that can and should be read.
Avoiding Common Grammar Mistakes When Introducing a Summary:
common mistake 1: In Pierce Lewis' essay "The Monument and the Bungalow," he encourages his readers. . .
common mistake 2: In his essay "The Monument and the Bungalow", Pierce Lewis encourages his readers . . .
What are summaries good for?
A summary is a very useful tool. Summaries allow people to share information quickly and efficiently, such as when a person tells the story of an interesting thing that happened on the way to work, a scientist publishes the results of months of research, or a news reporter describes developing tensions in war-torn countries. Summaries also help people remember things, such as the important ideas in books that may prove useful in writing a research paper, or key points in a history text or lecture. Teachers ask students to write summaries for a demonstration of the student's understanding of the curriculum. And summaries can also be effective evidence in an argument.
How long should my summary be?
Summaries can vary in length from a single sentence to many pages, depending on the length of the text (or events) being summarized, and/or the purpose of the summary. Consider, for example, Julius Caesar's famous statement, "Veni, vidi, vici" ("I came, I saw, I conquered"), summarizing his swift military triumph over Pharnaces in Zela. Now consider Cassius Dio's more detailed summary of the same event (Roman History XVII, trans.)
. . . on ascertaining that Caesar was on the way and was hurrying into Armenia, [Pharnaces] turned back and met him there near Zela. For now that Ptolemy was dead and Domitius vanquished, Caesar had decided that his delay in Egypt was neither creditable nor profitable to him, and had set out from there and had come with great speed into Armenia. And so the barbarian, alarmed and fearing Caesar's rapidity much more than his army, sent messengers to him before he drew near, making frequent proposals to see if he might on some terms or other except the present danger. One of the principal pleas that he presented was that he had not cooperated with Pompey, and he hoped to induce Caesar to grant a truce, particularly since the latter was anxious to hasten to Italy and Africa; and once Caesar was gone, he hoped to wage war again at his ease. Caesar suspected this, and do treated the first and second embassies with great kindness, in order that he might fall upon his foes as unexpectedly as possible because of his hopes of peace; but when the third deputation came, he uttered various reproaches against him one being that he had deserted Pompey, his benefactor. Then he no longer delayed, but immediately, that very day and just as he came from the march, joined battle. For a little while some confusion was caused him by the enemy's cavalry and scythe-bearing chariots, but after that he conquered with his heavy-armed troops. Pharnaces escaped into the sea and later tried to force his way into Bosporus, but Asander repulsed and killed him.
Caesar's version simply proclaims his triumph to the worldan ancient version of the modern political "sound byte." Providing more details about the battle would only muddy the main pointi.e., that Caesar is a great leader. The Roman senator Cassius, on the other hand, is more concerned with preserving the details of Roman military history for future generations, and so more detail is included in his summary. Both summaries are good given their different purposes.
1. What makes a good summary?
2. How to begin a summary
3. What are summaries good for?
4. How long should my summary be?